Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Tuesday Jul 14 2026 03:11
5 min

Oil prices climbed sharply after renewed US-Iran tensions raised fresh concerns about energy shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a major route for global crude oil and liquefied natural gas flows.
Brent crude futures settled at $83.30 a barrel, gaining $7.29 or 9.59%, while US West Texas Intermediate crude settled at $78.14, up $6.73 or 9.42%. Brent closed above $80, while WTI finished just below that level after its strongest daily advance in months.
The move reflected a sharp reassessment of geopolitical risk rather than a change in underlying oil demand alone. Traders reacted to reports that a renewed US naval blockade would cover Iran’s coastline, ports and oil terminals, raising the prospect of further disruption to regional shipping.
President Donald Trump said the US would reinstate the blockade and seek reimbursement at a 20% rate on cargo shipped through the Strait of Hormuz. He also suggested that Washington could take a leading role in protecting passage through the waterway.
The proposed charge has created uncertainty because the practical mechanism, scope and legal basis of any payment requirement have not been detailed. A UN shipping agency opposed mandatory tolls for international straits, adding another layer of operational and legal risk for shippers.
The Strait of Hormuz remains a critical chokepoint for global energy markets. Before the conflict, it carried around one-fifth of the world’s daily oil and LNG supplies, meaning that reduced tanker traffic can quickly affect expectations for available crude exports.
Even without a full interruption to physical supply, slower vessel movements, higher insurance costs and longer shipping routes can increase the effective cost of delivering oil to consumers. This is why crude prices can rise quickly when military activity or political statements create doubts over safe transit.
Market participants are likely to watch inbound tanker volumes closely. A sustained reduction in traffic could point to a more direct supply problem, while an improvement in shipping flows may reduce the geopolitical premium built into Brent and WTI prices.
The US Navy-led Joint Maritime Information Center reportedly said the blockade would begin on July 14 and apply broadly across Iranian maritime infrastructure. Iran, however, has rejected US involvement in managing the Strait of Hormuz and warned against unauthorised intervention.
That stand-off leaves oil markets highly sensitive to further developments. A clear and credible arrangement that supports commercial transit could ease immediate supply fears. Conversely, further attacks on vessels, ports or energy infrastructure could intensify concerns about exports from the Gulf.
For now, the market reaction shows that traders are pricing a higher risk of short-term disruption rather than assuming that supplies will immediately disappear.
The latest rise comes after a period in which supply expectations had placed downward pressure on crude prices. In its July outlook, the US Energy Information Administration forecast Brent at an average of $74 per barrel in the third quarter, based on expectations of recovering production and trade flows following earlier diplomacy.
That outlook was published before the latest escalation. It provides a reminder that oil prices remain influenced by both geopolitical events and broader fundamentals such as inventories, production recovery and demand growth.
If commercial traffic through Hormuz remains constrained, the renewed risk premium could keep crude prices elevated. If tensions ease and vessels resume more normal transit patterns, prices may retreat as traders refocus on supply growth and softer demand expectations.
The immediate focus will be on confirmed shipping activity through the Strait of Hormuz, official details of the proposed US measures and any signs of diplomatic de-escalation.
Brent’s close above $80 highlights the market’s sensitivity to disruption risks. WTI’s move towards $80 also signals stronger concern, although its lower settlement relative to Brent reflects the greater direct exposure of seaborne international supply to Hormuz shipping conditions.
Oil markets can remain volatile while the situation develops, particularly as headlines around military action, tanker movements and policy responses continue to emerge.
Risk Warning: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Markets.com. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Cryptocurrency CFD trading restrictions may apply depending on jurisdiction.