Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Tuesday Sep 22 2026 03:28
10 min

Critical Metals stock recorded one of Monday’s largest market gains as investors bet that a new Arctic security agreement could accelerate US involvement in Greenland’s rare-earth resources.
Shares of Critical Metals Corp. jumped $2.60, or approximately 38.6%, to close at $9.33. The rally lifted the company’s market capitalization to around $1.3 billion, while several other Greenland-linked mining shares posted even larger percentage gains.
The immediate catalyst was President Donald Trump’s announcement that the US, Denmark and Greenland had reached an agreement to strengthen security in the Arctic and North Atlantic. Although the agreement is primarily focused on military access and national security, investors interpreted it as potentially improving the political environment for Western investment in Greenland’s critical-minerals sector.
That interpretation placed Critical Metals and its Tanbreez heavy rare-earth project at the center of the market reaction.
Critical Metals briefly gained more than 40% during Monday’s trading session before closing 38% higher.
Greenland Energy rose approximately 141%, while Greenland Mines surged more than 230%. REalloys, which has an agreement covering a portion of future Tanbreez production, also advanced. Other US-listed rare-earth companies, including MP Materials, USA Rare Earth and Energy Fuels, attracted additional investor attention.
The moves reflected expectations that the Greenland agreement could support closer cooperation between the US government and mining companies attempting to establish non-Chinese supply chains.
However, the agreement itself did not announce a mining investment, project financing package or direct support for Critical Metals. The stock reaction was therefore based largely on the strategic implications of greater US involvement in Greenland rather than a change in the company’s existing contracts.
Market reports placed Critical Metals among Monday’s largest gainers, alongside technology and cryptocurrency-related stocks.
The proposed agreement is designed to expand and formalize cooperation among the US, Denmark and Greenland on security in the Arctic and North Atlantic.
It is expected to strengthen the US military presence on the island and prevent countries viewed as security threats, particularly China and Russia, from establishing military positions or making certain sensitive investments.
The deal does not transfer sovereignty over Greenland to the US. Greenland remains a self-governing territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, while its people retain their right to self-determination.
Denmark’s government said the agreement is expected to be signed during the United Nations General Assembly. It will then require the relevant national parliamentary procedures before entering into force. The Danish Prime Minister’s Office described the arrangement as strengthening NATO and Arctic security while recognizing Denmark’s territorial integrity and Greenland’s interests.
For mining investors, the most important element is the possibility that greater US security involvement could be followed by investment in infrastructure and critical-minerals projects. Greenland’s remote location means that mines often require extensive support for ports, roads, power supplies and processing facilities.
Nevertheless, no official document released so far guarantees that Critical Metals or Tanbreez will receive US government funding.
Critical Metals owns 92.5% of Tanbreez Mining Greenland following an acquisition completed in April. European Lithium retains the remaining 7.5%, although Critical Metals has previously discussed a potential transaction that could increase its ownership to 100%.
The company issued 14.5 million ordinary shares to complete the most recent acquisition. Critical Metals’ announcement described Tanbreez as one of the Western world’s most significant deposits of heavy rare-earth elements.
An initial technical report estimated that the project contains a mineral resource of approximately 45 million metric tons grading 0.4% total rare-earth oxides. About 27% of the rare-earth content was classified as heavy rare-earth elements.
The estimated resource is hosted within a much larger 4.7 billion metric ton kakortokite rock formation. This does not mean the entire formation is economically recoverable. Mineral resources must undergo additional engineering, metallurgical, environmental and economic analysis before they can be converted into mineable reserves.
Tanbreez’s potential importance comes from the composition of its resource. Heavy rare-earth elements such as dysprosium and terbium are used in high-performance permanent magnets, electric motors, wind turbines, advanced electronics and military systems.
The project is also located near deep-water fjords in southern Greenland, which the company says could provide year-round shipping access to the North Atlantic. That accessibility may give Tanbreez an advantage over Arctic projects requiring more complex transport infrastructure.
The initial resource estimate and geological characteristics are detailed in the company’s SEC-filed technical announcement.
The Critical Metals rally occurred as US-China tensions returned to the center of the rare-earth market.
Chinese exports of rare-earth magnets to the US fell to 512 metric tons in August. That represented a decline of approximately 20% from July and 13% from the previous year, according to Chinese customs data reported by the Financial Times.
Rare-earth magnets are essential for electric vehicles, industrial automation, robotics, renewable-energy equipment, fighter aircraft, missile systems and other advanced technologies.
China remains the world’s largest rare-earth producer and maintains an even greater position in processing and magnet manufacturing. That creates a strategic vulnerability for the US and Europe even when alternative mineral deposits are available elsewhere.
Developing a Western mine is only part of the challenge. The extracted material must also be separated, refined and converted into metals, alloys and finished magnets. China’s established processing infrastructure allows it to control much of this downstream value chain.
This explains why investors are assigning potential value not only to Tanbreez’s geological resource but also to Critical Metals’ proposed processing strategy.
Critical Metals intends to send part of Tanbreez’s future concentrate production to a proposed refinery in Romania.
Under the current term sheet, the planned joint venture facility would receive 50% of Tanbreez’s concentrate output. It is being designed to process as much as 100,000 metric tons of feed per year and produce rare-earth chlorides, critical-metal products and high-purity silica.
The company recently reported laboratory dissolution rates above 99% for eudialyte concentrate and outlined a process targeting 19 high-purity products.
Preliminary company modelling estimates that the refinery could generate annual revenue of approximately $2.2 billion before operating costs, taxes and capital recovery. The proposed facility has an early capital-cost estimate of approximately $1.85 billion, with a margin of error of plus or minus 25%.
These projections remain highly preliminary. Critical Metals has warned that the figures depend on additional engineering, metallurgical testing, permitting, commodity prices and a final investment decision. They should not be treated as guaranteed future revenue.
The company’s refinery study nevertheless illustrates its ambition to control more of the supply chain instead of operating solely as a mineral producer.
Rare-earth stocks may remain volatile ahead of the expected meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping.
The two leaders are likely to discuss trade, artificial intelligence and China’s export controls on critical minerals. A continuation of existing supply arrangements could reduce near-term pressure on Western manufacturers and cool speculation in rare-earth shares.
A breakdown in negotiations, by contrast, could increase fears of tighter Chinese export restrictions. That outcome would strengthen the strategic case for projects in Greenland, Australia, Canada and the US.
Critical Metals may be particularly sensitive to developments because its current valuation reflects expectations that Tanbreez could become a major alternative source of heavy rare earths.
Despite the strategic appeal of Tanbreez, Critical Metals remains a development-stage mining company.
Its principal risks include:
The company’s $1.3 billion market capitalization also represents a considerable valuation for a business that has not yet placed Tanbreez into commercial production.
A 38% single-day gain can attract momentum traders, but it can also increase the risk of a sharp reversal if the market’s expectations for US mining investment are not confirmed.
The Greenland security agreement strengthens the geopolitical relevance of the Tanbreez project, but it does not automatically improve the project’s financing, permits or development timetable.
Critical Metals now controls 92.5% of a potentially significant heavy rare-earth resource at a time when the US and Europe are actively seeking alternatives to Chinese supply. That position explains why investors reacted so strongly to signs of deeper US involvement in Greenland.
The next sustainable catalyst would need to be more concrete. Government financing, a binding refinery agreement, an additional offtake contract, completed feasibility work or a confirmed production schedule would provide clearer evidence that Tanbreez is moving toward commercial development.
Until then, Critical Metals stock is likely to remain highly sensitive to US-China trade relations, Greenland policy announcements and changes in rare-earth prices.
Risk Warning: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Markets.com. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Cryptocurrency CFD trading restrictions may apply depending on jurisdiction.