Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Wednesday Nov 11 2026 03:16
6 min

Oil prices recovered modestly in early Wednesday trading as markets reassessed the risk of further escalation between the United States and Iran.
Brent crude was reported at $92.10 a barrel, up 0.67%, in an early November 11 market update. On Tuesday, the international benchmark touched $89.16, its first move below $90 since August, before settling at $91.49, down 1.17%. US West Texas Intermediate crude settled Tuesday at $86.04 a barrel, a decline of 0.93%. These figures represent different quotation points: Brent’s Wednesday intraday price and both benchmarks’ Tuesday settlements.
The recovery left Brent above its recent intraday low, although a single rebound offers limited evidence about whether the broader decline has ended. Oil remains exposed to changes in expectations about military action and the security of regional exports.
The immediate market question is whether the latest diplomatic signals will produce an agreement that meaningfully reduces supply uncertainty. Until that becomes clearer, prices may continue to react sharply to statements from officials.
The latest weakness followed a substantial sell-off earlier in the week.
On Monday, November 9, Brent settled at $92.57 a barrel, down $5.75, or 5.85%. WTI settled at $86.85, down $3.98, or 4.38%. Both contracts extended their losses after settlement as President Donald Trump downplayed the likelihood of renewed attacks on Iran, provided negotiations continued to progress.
A lower perceived probability of further attacks can reduce the additional amount buyers are willing to pay for exposure to potentially disrupted supplies. This component of pricing is commonly described as a geopolitical risk premium.
That adjustment can occur before production or exports change. Futures markets respond to expectations about future availability, so a credible reduction in escalation risk may put downward pressure on prices even while existing restrictions remain.
The reverse also applies. If diplomatic expectations deteriorate, the market may rebuild that premium before any confirmed loss of supply.
Qatar said on Tuesday that it had seen progress in US-Iran talks following Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani’s meeting with Trump at the White House.
However, the Qatari foreign ministry’s assessment did not establish a timetable for an agreement. Officials acknowledged uncertainty over how close the two sides were to a deal. Continued mediation and more positive public statements therefore represent an improvement in diplomatic conditions rather than confirmation that the conflict is approaching a negotiated end.
For oil markets, that distinction matters. Talks can lower the perceived likelihood of new disruption, while an implemented agreement could affect the conditions under which oil is actually exported and transported.
An announcement without clear operational details may have a smaller lasting impact than measures that restore confidence in shipping, clarify restrictions or establish a credible process for resolving disputes.
The durability of the recent decline consequently depends partly on whether expectations are followed by practical changes.
Maritime risks have continued alongside diplomatic efforts. Earlier this week, both Washington and Tehran reported that shipping had been hit in or near the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding regional transport conditions.
Qatar has also called for the waterway to reopen to shipping as soon as possible. Its comments underline the gap between encouraging diplomatic language and a dependable improvement in transport security.
The implications for prices depend on the scale and duration of any disruption. A brief incident may generate a short-lived reaction, while sustained restrictions could have broader consequences for delivery schedules and the availability of crude.
Market participants therefore need to distinguish between statements about negotiations and evidence about physical movements. Vessel access, export continuity and the implementation of any agreement provide different information from political rhetoric.
This also helps explain why prices can fall on diplomatic optimism while remaining vulnerable to sudden rebounds.
The next phase of trading is likely to depend on whether the perceived improvement in relations becomes more concrete.
Further progress toward an agreement could place additional pressure on the geopolitical premium. A sustained improvement in shipping conditions would strengthen the argument that supply risks are easing.
Conversely, renewed attacks, stalled negotiations or additional restrictions could reverse that adjustment. An initial price decline may prove difficult to sustain if the underlying conditions for transporting oil remain uncertain.
Beyond geopolitics, demand and available supply will continue to influence prices. A diplomatic breakthrough would change one major source of uncertainty, but it would not by itself establish whether the global market faces a surplus or a shortage.
Brent’s recovery toward $92 suggests that selling pressure has moderated from the recent low. The broader outlook remains conditional: diplomacy offers a route toward lower disruption risk, while unresolved negotiations and maritime insecurity leave room for further volatility.
Get a generous deposit bonus on your first trade with Markets.com. Hurry—claim yours today!
Risk Warning: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Markets.com. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Cryptocurrency CFD trading restrictions may apply depending on jurisdiction.