Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Friday Nov 21 2025 05:40
2 min
Digital asset treasury companies (DATs) are facing a critical period, potentially encountering "meaningful pressure" if MSCI, a leading global index provider, decides to exclude them from its indices next January. This warning comes from a financial analyst, indicating that such a move seems likely.
Last October, MSCI announced it was consulting with the investment community about the possibility of excluding companies with balance sheets comprised of over 50% digital assets, such as Bitcoin (BTC). Some feedback suggested these companies "exhibit characteristics similar to investment funds, which are currently not eligible for index inclusion."
According to Charlie Sherry, Head of Finance at Australian crypto exchange BTC Markets, the odds of MSCI excluding DATs are "solidly in favor of it." He explained that MSCI "only puts changes like this into consultation when they're already leaning that way."
The consultation is scheduled to continue until December 31, with the final decision announced on January 15 of next year, and any resulting changes taking effect in February. If MSCI decides to exclude DATs, index-tracking funds would be compelled to sell off their shares, potentially leading to "meaningful pressure" on the affected companies.
The preliminary list includes 38 crypto-related companies under MSCI's scrutiny, including Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy, Sharplink Gaming, and crypto miners like Riot Platforms and Marathon Digital Holdings.
Sherry points out that this represents a shift in tone compared to the past year. Previously, corporate strategies heavily reliant on cryptocurrencies were praised as capital markets innovation. Now, major index providers are tightening their definitions, demonstrating that the market is moving away from the "everything is adoption" phase and returning to more conservative standards.
A note from JPMorgan analysts warned that MicroStrategy could lose $2.8 billion if MSCI proceeds with this decision, and approximately $9 billion of its estimated $56 billion market value is held in passive funds that track the indices, according to Bloomberg.
It remains uncertain whether other indices will follow MSCI's lead. Sherry explained that "index providers often monitor each other's actions, but they don't always move in lockstep. S&P's treatment of MicroStrategy shows a precedent for taking a stricter stance, yet each provider has its own methodology and client base to consider."
Meanwhile, Sherry believes that clearer rules regarding corporate classification ultimately benefit the crypto space. He added: "When companies fully understand how their treasury decisions will be treated, it removes uncertainty for both issuers and investors. Well-defined frameworks tend to enhance long-term institutional confidence, even if the short-term impact is uncomfortable for stocks built around Bitcoin holdings."
Risk Warning: this article represents only the author’s views and is for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial guidance, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform.When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange) and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and could result in capital loss.Past performance is not indicative of any future results. This information is provided for informative purposes only and should not be construed to be investment advice. Trading cryptocurrency CFDs and spread bets is restricted for all UK retail clients.