Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Wednesday Apr 15 2026 08:24
3 min
A recent study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas suggests that prolonged disruptions to global oil trade stemming from the conflict in Iran could significantly push overall US inflation rates above 4% by the end of the current year, with the potential for even more aggressive surges in the short term. These projections are prompting a reassessment of strategies by Federal Reserve decision-makers as they grapple with the escalating consequences of geopolitical tensions on price stability.
While the immediate impact of these supply shocks on inflation expectations appears relatively muted, the research emphasizes that their long-term effect is likely to be negligible. This finding offers a critical framework for monetary policymakers who are working to contain potential price upticks. This is particularly pertinent given that Federal Reserve officials had previously anticipated inflation to trend back towards the Fed's 2% target later in the year, as the effects of past tariff shocks gradually subsided.
The sharp ascent in oil prices, which consumers directly experience through escalating gasoline costs, poses a tangible threat to reversing this anticipated trend. The concern among Fed policymakers extends beyond the direct "wallet-shrinking" effect on households; they are also worried that a resurgence of inflation could destabilize inflation expectations, which have remained largely anchored. Chicago Fed President Goolsbee voiced these concerns, articulating that the further one moves away from the 2% target, the more entrenched inflation becomes within contracts. He explained that when inflation is perceived to be heading towards 5%, wage demands escalate, leading businesses to raise product prices, creating a challenging scenario for central banks.
The Dallas Fed's research paper presents various simulations detailing the potential impact of different Strait of Hormuz blockade scenarios on US inflation. The Strait, a critical artery for approximately 20% of the world's oil shipments, has already faced significant blockades. The study meticulously models these potential disruptions to provide a quantitative outlook.
The research indicates that if the Strait were to remain blockaded for a full quarter, the annualized inflation rate could surge by 5.2 percentage points by March. However, this effect is projected to dissipate rapidly, with only a modest increase of 0.35 percentage points expected in the fourth quarter's inflation rate.
In a more severe scenario, where the blockade persists for three quarters (nine months), the study forecasts a drastic increase in oil prices from the current level of $115 per barrel to $167 per barrel. This significant price hike would translate into a substantial surge in the fourth quarter inflation rate, potentially by as much as 1.8 percentage points. For context, the overall Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, a key inflation measure, stood at a 2.8% year-over-year increase in January, below the Fed's 2% target.
Further analysis within the study reveals the impact on core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices. A one-quarter closure of the Strait could lead to a 0.18 percentage point increase in core inflation. A three-quarter closure could elevate core inflation by approximately 0.49 percentage points. In January, core inflation was recorded at 3.1%.
Encouragingly, the research suggests that the rise in household inflation expectations would likely be contained. The paper posits that one-year inflation expectations might increase by a maximum of 0.8 percentage points. More critically, the five-to-ten-year inflation expectations, which are closely monitored by Fed policymakers, are projected to rise by a mere 0.09 percentage points at most.
In conclusion, this Dallas Fed study underscores the significant risks that geopolitical conflicts can pose to price stability within the US economy. It emphasizes the vital importance of closely monitoring energy markets and inflation expectations for informed monetary policy decisions.
Risk Warning: This article represents only the author’s views and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Trading cryptocurrency CFDs and spread bets is restricted for all UK retail clients.