Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Monday Nov 17 2025 05:50
2 min
Bitcoin may not be as resilient to network attacks as most think, according to Bitcoin pioneer Nick Szabo. He argues that while Bitcoin is a trust-minimized network, it isn’t entirely trustless and can still be "attacked" by nation-states and corporations.
In a post to X on Sunday, Szabo explained that every cryptocurrency and layer 1 network has a "legal attack" surface that enables them to be disrupted by governments. Thinking Bitcoin or any blockchain protocol is a “magical anarcho-capitalist Swiss army knife that can withstand any kind of governmental attack in any legal area is insanity,” he said.
Szabo’s insights carry weight in the crypto community as he was an early pioneer of smart contracts. Some even speculate that he could secretly be Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, given that he developed the idea of Bit Gold in 1988. However, Szabo has publicly refuted claims that he is Nakamoto.
In a rebuttal post, Szabo said action against Bitcoin miners, node operators and wallet service providers could be coordinated in jurisdictions that uphold the rule of law.
Szabo was specifically talking about "arbitrary data" and the ability to delete certain content, should regulators force network participants to manipulate the network.
It ties into the months-long Bitcoin Cores vs Knots debate over whether certain non-financial content — such as pictures, videos, and audio — through Ordinals, Runes, and BRC-20 transactions has a place in the Bitcoin ecosystem.
Szabo’s comments were criticized by several Bitcoiners, including Chris Seedor, the CEO of Bitcoin seed storage provider Seedor, who said Szabo was overestimating the power that speculative “legal boogeymen” possess. “Bitcoin's resilience was never about predicting every possible domain of law — it was about minimizing technical points where coercion can bite,” Seedor said, arguing that regulators would have shut down PGP, Tor, and other protocols if they could have.
Risk Warning: this article represents only the author’s views and is for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial guidance, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform.When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange) and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and could result in capital loss.Past performance is not indicative of any future results. This information is provided for informative purposes only and should not be construed to be investment advice. Trading cryptocurrency CFDs and spread bets is restricted for all UK retail clients.