Access Restricted for EU Residents
You are attempting to access a website operated by an entity not regulated in the EU. Products and services on this website do not comply with EU laws or ESMA investor-protection standards.
As an EU resident, you cannot proceed to the offshore website.
Please continue on the EU-regulated website to ensure full regulatory protection.
Wednesday Oct 28 2026 06:54
7 min

Oil prices recovered on Wednesday, 28 October 2026, as renewed concerns about Saudi energy infrastructure brought Gulf supply security back into focus.
Brent crude futures rose $1.48, or 1.3%, to $115.36 a barrel by 5:40am UAE time. US West Texas Intermediate crude futures gained $1.22, or 1.22%, to $101.12.
The advance followed a decline of nearly $2 on Tuesday, when diplomatic talks helped ease concerns about regional supply disruptions. Wednesday’s reversal highlighted how quickly security developments can change the oil market’s assessment of risk. The quoted prices are an early-session snapshot rather than closing levels.
For UAE readers, the significance extends beyond the international benchmarks. Developments affecting Gulf energy infrastructure can influence the outlook for export revenues, transport expenses and trade-related activity. However, the implications differ across industries and depend on the duration of any disruption.
Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis said on Tuesday that they had hit Saudi Arabia’s Ras Tanura refinery with a ballistic missile. The group’s military spokesperson, Yahya Saree, claimed the strike caused a fire at the complex.
Saudi authorities had not immediately confirmed the strike in the reporting reviewed. Ras Tanura has refining capacity of approximately 550,000 barrels per day, and the wider complex includes a shipping terminal.
The distinction between an attack claim and confirmed operational damage is central to assessing the market impact. Refinery capacity does not establish how much production has stopped, while an incident near a terminal does not automatically mean crude loading has been interrupted.
For Gulf energy markets, the next useful evidence would include updates on refinery throughput, terminal operations and shipment schedules. Until those details are established, the rebound reflects concern about possible supply losses rather than a verified reduction of a specific size.
The latest concerns also underline the importance of the UAE’s alternative oil export infrastructure.
The Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline connects Habshan with Fujairah, providing a route for crude exports that bypasses the Strait of Hormuz. An International Energy Agency factsheet identifies this pipeline as one of the region’s operational alternatives to shipping crude through the strait.
For the UAE, this infrastructure provides flexibility when maritime routes face disruption. It also makes Fujairah relevant to any assessment of regional energy resilience.
However, an alternative route cannot remove every source of uncertainty. Loading capacity, vessel availability, security conditions and the ability to redirect supplies can still influence export performance.
The Saudi incident does not itself establish a disruption to UAE facilities or shipments. Its local relevance lies in the broader question of how reliably Gulf producers can maintain deliveries if regional hostilities intensify.
A sustained increase in crude prices can support the revenue outlook for oil producers when production and sales volumes remain stable. For businesses that consume fuel, the same development can create cost pressure.
The effect is therefore uneven. Energy producers may benefit from stronger realised prices, while transport operators and other fuel-intensive businesses could face higher expenses if wholesale increases reach their purchasing costs.
Even within the energy sector, the implications vary. Upstream producers, refiners, distributors and service providers have different revenue models. A rise in Brent does not translate into the same earnings effect for every company.
These are potential transmission channels rather than confirmed changes in UAE corporate results. Contract terms, hedging arrangements, operating costs and the duration of the price move would determine the eventual financial impact.
For local equity investors, company disclosures and operating updates would provide stronger evidence than assuming that all energy-related shares must move with crude.
For households and businesses in Dubai, Abu Dhabi and the wider UAE, a higher crude benchmark raises questions about future fuel expenses. However, a single trading session cannot establish the size or timing of any change in retail or commercial fuel costs.
Crude is an input into refined fuels. Processing costs, product-market conditions, distribution and pricing arrangements also influence what end users pay.
The dirham’s fixed exchange-rate relationship with the US dollar is another relevant consideration. The Central Bank of the UAE maintains the peg through its foreign-exchange operations. This limits movements in the dirham-dollar exchange rate as a source of offset when dollar-denominated energy prices rise.
That does not mean pump prices or transport charges will rise by the same percentage as Brent. Any assessment of UAE retail fuel prices should rely on the relevant official announcement, while business costs depend on individual supply contracts.
Regional diplomatic efforts remain a possible counterweight to supply concerns. Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan met Iranian officials in Tehran on Monday to seek a reduction in tensions.
For the UAE’s trade and energy outlook, the practical outcome matters more than the announcement of talks alone. Fewer security incidents and dependable shipping conditions could reduce uncertainty. Further attacks or confirmed infrastructure damage could have the opposite effect.
Oil prices may therefore remain sensitive to both diplomatic developments and operational updates. Neither the early rebound nor the attack claim establishes how the situation will develop.
Brent above $115 and WTI above $101 put higher energy prices back in focus for UAE market participants. A sustained advance could support producer revenues, while increasing cost pressure for some fuel-consuming businesses.
The central uncertainty remains whether the claimed Saudi strike caused a meaningful interruption. Confirmed damage or further incidents could sustain supply concerns; stable operations and diplomatic progress could reduce them.
For UAE readers, the clearest indicators are actual export flows, official infrastructure updates and evidence of changing business costs. These will help distinguish a temporary geopolitical premium from a more lasting shift in energy-market conditions.
Get a generous deposit bonus on your first trade with Markets.com. Hurry—claim yours today!
Risk Warning: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, investment research, or a recommendation to trade. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Markets.com. When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange), and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leveraged products can result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Before trading, ensure you fully understand the risks involved and consider your investment objectives and level of experience. Cryptocurrency CFD trading restrictions may apply depending on jurisdiction.